Paradigm accuses SEC of bypassing rules in Binance lawsuit

Paradigm accuses SEC of bypassing rules in Binance lawsuit


Venture capital firm Paradigm has criticized the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for bypassing the standard rulemaking procedures in its current legal action against the cryptocurrency exchange Binance.

In a statement released on Friday, Sept. 29, Paradigm stated the SEC is attempting to use the allegations in its complaint to alter the law without adhering to the established rulemaking process. Paradigm firmly believes that the SEC is exceeding its regulatory boundaries and further stated that it strongly opposes this tactic.

In June, the SEC initiated legal action against Binance, accusing it of multiple violations of securities laws, such as operating without the necessary registration as an exchange, broker-dealer or clearing agency. Paradigm also underscored that the SEC has been pursuing similar cases against various cryptocurrency exchanges lately and voiced apprehension that the SEC’s stance “could fundamentally reshape our comprehension of securities law in several critical aspects.“

Screenshot of Paradigm’s amicus brief  Source: Paradigm

Additionally, Paradigm highlighted concerns regarding the shortcomings of the SEC’s application of the Howey test. The SEC often relies on the Howey test — originating from a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case involving citrus groves — to determine whether transactions meet the criteria for investment contracts and fall under securities regulations.

okex

In its amicus brief, Paradigm asserted that many assets are actively marketed, purchased and traded based on their profit prospects. Nevertheless, the SEC has consistently exempted them from being classified as securities. The brief further pointed out instances such as gold, silver and fine art, underscoring that merely having the potential for value appreciation does not inherently classify their sale as a security transaction.

Related: Binance Russia buyer tightlipped on owners, denies CZ involvement

USD Coin (USDC) issuer Circle has recently become a participant in the ongoing legal dispute between Binance and the SEC. Circle believes the SEC should not categorize stablecoins as securities.

Circle argues that these assets should not be categorized as securities because individuals acquiring stablecoins do not do so to derive profits.

Magazine: Crypto regulation: Does SEC Chair Gary Gensler have the final say?



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You have not selected any currency to display

Pin It on Pinterest

Crypto-Moon
Coinmama
Crypto-Moon
Paradigm accuses SEC of bypassing rules in Binance lawsuit
okex
Blockonomics
Stablecoin market surges post-genius act as banks and asset managers enter
South Korean Regulator Urges ETF Managers to Scale Back Exposure to Crypto-Related Companies
US Senators Unveil Draft Bill to Overhaul Crypto Regulation Framework
US Government Puts Stamp of Approval on Key Digital Asset in Historic First Move
Trump signs GENIUS Act into law, positioning Ripple’s RLUSD for institutional adoption
SEC Commissioner Proposes Cross-Border Sandbox for Crypto and Tokenized Assets
Changelly
Changelly
VeChain Renaissance Overview: A Series of Major VeChainThor Upgrades Paving the Road to Blockchain Mass Adoption
Galaxy Digital sends over 10,000 Bitcoin from Satoshi-era stash to exchanges
Ethereum ETFs Attract $2.4 Billion in Six Days, Surpass Bitcoin Funds
Miner Weekly: Bitmain Funnels 187 Tons of Antminer Parts to Skirt US Tariffs
Crypto Market Retreats Amid Record Liquidity and Signs of Froth
VeChain Renaissance Overview: A Series of Major VeChainThor Upgrades Paving the Road to Blockchain Mass Adoption
Galaxy Digital sends over 10,000 Bitcoin from Satoshi-era stash to exchanges
Ethereum ETFs Attract $2.4 Billion in Six Days, Surpass Bitcoin Funds
Miner Weekly: Bitmain Funnels 187 Tons of Antminer Parts to Skirt US Tariffs